top of page
Search

The Illusion of Stability: Why Strategy’s Bitcoin Model Is Cracking

by Ram ben Ze’ev



The Illusion of Stability: Why Strategy’s Bitcoin Model Is Cracking
The Illusion of Stability: Why Strategy’s Bitcoin Model Is Cracking

What happens when a company becomes so deeply committed to its core asset that it can no longer step away from it without causing its own collapse? That is the question now facing Strategy, and the answer is neither flattering nor encouraging.


The company has become synonymous with its Bitcoin reserves. As of this writing, Bitcoin is trading around $86,700 per coin, and Strategy sits on a massive holding of roughly 650,000 BTC. For years this has been spun as a strategic advantage, a visionary move, a financial revolution. But now, with Bitcoin continuing its decline and Strategy forced to raise capital through issuing new common shares, the narrative is falling apart.



The company has reportedly established a funding reserve meant to support dividend payments on its preferred shares. Depending on the source, that reserve is expected to last somewhere between twelve and twenty-four months. That reserve was not generated through profit. It did not come from business operations. It came from issuing new shares and diluting the existing shareholders. In other words: new money is paying old obligations. Many would argue that this structure is dangerously close to the logic of a Ponzi system, even if it is legal, transparent, and technically compliant.


There is another troubling signal that should not be ignored. Strategy’s modified Net Asset Value (mNav) — the critical metric that measures the company’s enterprise value relative to its Bitcoin holdings — is now at or near 1x. That is the threshold at which Strategy’s enterprise value is effectively no greater than its Bitcoin reserve. When that ratio compresses, it sends a simple message: the market is no longer valuing the business. It is only valuing the Bitcoin.


A company cannot operate indefinitely on a single asset while draining capital reserves to satisfy dividend and interest obligations. The moment Bitcoin's price continues to fall, the reserve shrinks in real terms, and the ability to avoid liquidation disappears. If the capital markets stop absorbing new common shares, or if Bitcoin continues its downward trend, Strategy will have little choice but to begin selling portions of its Bitcoin pile. Once that starts, it becomes a vicious cycle: liquidation pressures the market, the market falls further, and Strategy must sell again. The very asset that was supposed to make Strategy invincible instead becomes its undoing.



This is not a question of whether Michael Saylor or Strategy still believes in Bitcoin. It is not even about whether Bitcoin holds long-term value. It is about the sustainability of a corporate model that has tied its entire existence to a single volatile commodity, while taking on large fixed obligations and relying increasingly on equity sales to finance them.


For years, Strategy has celebrated its position as the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin. But size is not protection. Size is exposure. And exposure without balance is fragility. The model has always carried risk. Today that risk is no longer theoretical. The warning signs are flashing in plain view: a shrinking mNav, ongoing share dilution, finite reserves, and the looming necessity to sell the very asset that built the company.


The conclusion is difficult to avoid. The Strategy model is not only under pressure; it is showing signs of failure. If Bitcoin continues to decline or even remain stagnant for long enough, the entire structure becomes unstable. At that point, Strategy will not be a revolutionary financial institution. It will be a company forced into liquidation to survive, undermined by the very asset it worshipped.


Investors can ignore this reality for a while. Markets are slow to admit mistakes. But mathematics does not bend for enthusiasm, and capital structures do not defy gravity forever. The only question now is not whether the crisis comes, but how many warning signs people will overlook before it does.



>>>> BUY ME A COFFEE <<<<


###


bottom of page